{"id":1492,"date":"2026-07-21T22:15:42","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T22:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/commercialrelocationpros.com\/?p=1492"},"modified":"2026-07-21T22:15:42","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T22:15:42","slug":"j-d-vance-isnt-a-fool-why-does-he-act-like-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/commercialrelocationpros.com\/?p=1492","title":{"rendered":"J. D. Vance Isn\u2019t a Fool. Why Does He Act Like One?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

This is an edition of The<\/i> Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. <\/i>Sign up for it here.<\/i><\/small><\/p>\n

Read more Iraq\u2019s Man in the Middle<\/a><\/p>\n

When J. D. Vance announced the title of his new book, some bookworms noticed a curious convergence. The vice president\u2019s first book is Hillbilly Elegy<\/i>, a title that closely parallels Appalachian Elegy<\/i>, a poetry collection by the radical Black feminist author bell hooks. Communion<\/i>, his second volume, shares its name, though not its subject matter, with another hooks work (hers is on \u201cthe female search for love,\u201d and his discusses his conversion to Catholicism).<\/p>\n

Many people seemed incredulous at the idea that Vance would be familiar with hooks, but I’m not so sure. Even if Vance has never read hooks, he could very easily be aware of her. (He has previously declined to comment on the titles\u2019 similarities.) Vance climbed from an impoverished, troubled childhood to graduate with honors from the Ohio State University and then attend Yale Law School. People who manage such rises are typically intellectual sponges, hoovering up knowledge to make up ground on more privileged classmates. Accounts of Vance\u2019s time in law school, including stories of his close friendship with a transgender classmate, all point to a young man with an open mind, broad interests, and knowledge.<\/p>\n

This makes it peculiar to watch Vance work so hard to appear dumb these days. Liberal pundits used to describe former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as \u201ca dumb person\u2019s idea of a smart person.\u201d Vance appears to be performing a smart person\u2019s idea of a dumb person. During an interview with Joe Rogan last week, as my colleague Helen Lewis reported, Vance acted perplexed that people had been so offended when a UFC fighter, competing in a fight at the White House, called former First Lady Michelle Obama a man. Rogan was left to provide some explanation.<\/p>\n

In June, Vance feigned ignorance about the fact that Democrats are more likely than Republicans to vote by mail, a tendency that produces the familiar pattern known as the \u201cblue shift\u201d in election tallies. In May, during a White House briefing, he argued that congressional Democrats\u2019 applause for King Charles III during a joint meeting of Congress proved that \u201cNo Kings\u201d rallies critical of Trump were hypocritical. \u201cMaybe they don\u2019t care so much about kings as they pretend that they do,\u201d he said. (Yes, he said this with a very straight face. See for yourself.) \u201cMaybe they just don\u2019t like the agenda that we\u2019re implementing that\u2019s actually making American workers and American families safe and prosperous again.\u201d<\/p>\n

He\u2019s been at this for some time. In 2025, on the comedian Theo Von\u2019s podcast, Vance said, \u201cI feel like something happened, like, 10 years ago, where every\u2014it\u2019s like you have to think that every single person who fought for the Confederate side was an evil person. I just think that\u2019s so stupid.\u201d That would be stupid, if anyone were arguing it. In reality, the big debate has been about questions such as whether military bases should be named for traitors and whether governments should host monuments to a rebellion to defend slavery. In 2024, Vance told what he quickly acknowledged were falsehoods about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, to bring attention to administration talking points about immigration.<\/p>\n

Separately, Vance has developed a conspiratorial mode of thinking\u2014a plague on many otherwise smart people. Despite having access to some of the best information in the world, he reportedly became convinced that a broad plot was behind Charlie Kirk\u2019s assassination, alarming his wife; Vance suggested on Rogan\u2019s show that Jeffrey Epstein had shadowy government connections in Israel or the United States. (Perhaps Vance was thinking of Epstein\u2019s ties to Donald Trump or Howard Lutnick?)<\/p>\n

Why is a smart man spending so much time saying stupid things? The simplest explanation is that Vance believes his voters are stupid. Or as Vance himself told Rogan last week: \u201cThere\u2019s a real populism that I\u2019m very much a fan of because I think you should be responsive to people, but there\u2019s, like, a faux populism of: The way that I\u2019m going to appeal to people is by assuming that they\u2019re idiots and acting like they\u2019re idiots<\/i>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more AI Companies Are Stripping Colleges of Their Best Researchers<\/a><\/p>\n

This is admission by analysis. All politicians pander, but the best of them do it with some finesse. Vance, who struggles through the most basic photo ops, is not one of the best; his two successful elections are both testaments to Trump\u2019s political muscle. In 2022, when he was a U.S. Senate candidate, I included Vance in a round-up of very intelligent Republicans who were clumsily pretending to be fools for electoral purposes. Vance seems to have doubled down on the strategy since then, but each new incident just offers more evidence of his dripping disdain for voters\u2019 intelligence.<\/p>\n

This may not be the wisest political strategy, H. L. Mencken notwithstanding. Vance\u2019s approval ratings have been underwater for more than a year, and the Never Trump pollster Sarah Longwell recently conducted a focus group with Trump voters and found that Vance has left them cold. Either way, Vance\u2019s performance plays as tragicomedy: comic because he\u2019s so bad at it, but tragic because of who Vance was not that long ago. Much has been made of his critique of Trump in his 2016 Atlantic <\/i>essay, and although his flip-flop on the president is astonishing, he has also reversed himself on a more fundamental view of politics.<\/p>\n

In that essay, he criticized the demagogic tendency to condescend to people in so-called flyover country, where he grew up\u2014to view them as yokels who could be easily manipulated with simplistic talking points and grievance plays. The harms that Trump identified, Vance wrote, \u201cdemand serious thought and measured action\u2014from governments, yes, but also from community leaders and individuals.\u201d Trump, he argued, was cynically co-opting those harms for his own gain and doing Americans a disservice. That Vance was right; this Vance doesn\u2019t seem to care.<\/p>\n

Related:<\/b><\/p>\n

\n